Your code review is obsolete

Code review was built for a world where humans wrote the code. At Google 75% of new code is now AI-generated, at Anthropic over 80%. The machine writes. The question is who steers.

Then: experience. Now: judgement.

The old model rewarded years at the keyboard: craftsmanship was what generated capacity - the more experienced the hands, the more got built. Today agents generate the capacity, and the decisive skill is reviewing what they produce - with a firm grip on composable architecture and agentic development.

Then: obedience. Now: intervention.

The old tools rewarded compliance - follow the rules, match the template. Agent-written code passes those checks easily, and duplicates logic at machine speed. What matters now is the human who intervenes: challenges, corrects and refines the machine, keeps the architecture composable, and documents it so the system stays ownable.

The risk is not bugs. It is losing control.

Software no one steers becomes software no one can change, scale, sell or hand over. It surfaces late: in a due diligence, a key person leaving, a rewrite nobody budgeted for. Remove the human from the loop and you remove the only one who can tell the machine it is heading the wrong way.

The new question

Not "is the code correct?" but "is this team steering the machine - or just accepting it?" AgenticReview measures exactly that.