For CTOs and CIOs: are your teams steering their agents?
Your teams already code with agents; the question is whether they steer them - and you need to see it per project, over time, not once a year.
Engineering metrics for the agent era
Throughput, lead time and DORA show how fast work ships. With agents, speed is cheap; what decides is whether the work is steered and the structure holds. AgenticReview adds those metrics - composable structure, craftsmanship, and cooperation between people and agents - next to the delivery numbers you already track.
Per project and across the portfolio
Every product gets its own score, and divisions and the company roll up from the same repositories. You see which projects build on a structure that scales and which are drifting - without asking teams for reports.
Over time: is steering getting better?
Each review adds a month to the curve. You see whether guardrails, plans and review get stronger as agents take on more of the work - or thin out while volume grows.
Beyond DORA: steering and structure
DORA tells you how the pipeline performs. It does not tell you whether a business rule is defined once or five times, or whether anyone but its author could take over a service. AgenticReview measures exactly that - the part that decides whether today's speed lasts.
Handover risk before it becomes a crisis
Knowledge that lives in one person's head - or one person's prompts - shows up in the history long before someone leaves. AgenticReview flags it while it is still cheap to fix.
How to use AgenticReview in your process
In planning: pick the weakest dimension as the next improvement goal. In reviews: use the action plan to decide what agents may change without a human. In retros: compare this month with the last. Before a handover, a reorganisation or a funding round: run a review and share the report.